What can a landlord charge for a rental application in New Mexico?

Verified August 26, 2026 All New Mexico topics →

New Mexico caps the rental screening fee at $50 and makes it the only charge an owner may impose to process an application, a rule that took effect on June 20, 2025.

Cited to NMSA 1978, Section 47-8-19.2 47-8-19.2(A) and (A)(5) and 23 more cited sources · Verified August 26, 2026

The fee comes with conditions: the owner must give written or digital notice and obtain the applicant's written agreement before charging it, must issue a receipt, may not charge it for a unit that is not available, and may not take more than one fee from the same applicant within 90 calendar days for properties under the same ownership. The whole fee must come back within 30 calendar days if an earlier applicant takes the unit or if the owner does not actually screen the applicant, and the owner must give the applicant a copy of any reports used. A published listing must set out every cost of the tenancy in plain language, with each fee itemized. An owner who charges an unauthorized screening fee is liable for $250 and must return all fees paid. New Mexico does not regulate holding money taken to reserve a unit before signing, has no reusable screening report regime, and imposes no denial-notice duty beyond the copy-of-reports requirement.

New Mexico application & screening fees at a glance

Application fee cap

$50 maximum screening fee, and that fee is the only charge an owner may impose to process a rental application.

Since June 20, 2025 an owner may charge an applicant a screening fee of no more than fifty dollars to cover the cost of obtaining information about the applicant, including a consumer credit report, a reference check or a screening service. The same section states that the owner shall not charge any other fees to process an application, so the fifty dollars is a ceiling on the total application-stage charge rather than on one component of it. The amount is fixed in the statute; it is not adjusted for inflation and no agency publishes an annual figure.

Fee limited to actual screening cost Yes
Screening charge rules

An owner may charge the screening fee only for a unit that is actually available, may not take more than one screening fee from the same applicant within 90 calendar days across commonly owned properties, must wait to collect the money until earlier applicants are resolved, and must give the applicant a copy of any reports used.

Four conditions ride with the fee. An owner may not charge it when the owner knows or should know that the unit is not available for rent then or will not be available at the start of the residency. An owner must place a hold on a credit card, or wait to deposit cash or checks, until all earlier applicants have either been screened and rejected or been offered the unit and declined to enter into a rental agreement. No other charge may be imposed to process the application. And an owner may not charge more than one screening fee to the same applicant where the screening was completed within 90 calendar days of the application date for any properties under the same ownership. A separate provision requires the owner to give the applicant a copy of any reports used to screen them.

Receipt required Yes
Refund required in some circumstances Yes
Refund rules

The whole screening fee goes back within 30 calendar days if an earlier applicant takes the unit, or if the owner does not obtain a credit report, perform a reference check, use a screening service, or process the application. It must be returned by certified mail, destroyed on request if it was paid by check, or made available for the applicant to collect.

The duty covers the full fee, not a portion of it, and the deadline runs in calendar days. The second trigger tracks the fee’s purpose: the money comes back where the owner does not obtain a consumer credit report, perform a reference check, use a screening service to obtain information about the applicant, or process the application. The statute also sets out how the money comes back, giving the owner three routes and giving an applicant who paid by check the option to have it destroyed instead. There is no separate duty to return an amount collected above what the reports cost.

Disclosure before collecting

Before taking a screening fee an owner must give the applicant written or digital notice of it and get the applicant's written agreement to pay it; separately, a published listing must state in plain language every cost of the tenancy, with the base rent and each fee itemized and readily identifiable.

The listing duty covers the base rent that will be assessed and a description of all fees or charges that will be assessed during the residency. An owner is not held responsible where an outside website fails to reproduce the costs the owner supplied. New Mexico does not require an owner to publish or hand over the criteria an application will be judged against, and does not require a breakdown showing how the fifty dollars is spent.

Denial-notice duties (state law)

New Mexico requires no denial notice, but an owner must give the applicant a copy of any reports used to screen them, whether or not the application is approved.

The copy-of-reports duty is unconditional: it is not triggered by a rejection and carries no deadline or prescribed contents. No state statute sets out what a denial must say, when it must be sent, or what reasons must be given. Duties owed by consumer reporting agencies and users of consumer reports under federal law operate separately and are not part of the state rule.

Reusable screening reports No statute on reusable screening reports
Holding deposits No statute on holding deposits
Rental fee-transparency rules

A published listing must show every cost of the tenancy in plain language with each fee itemized; charging an applicant a fee that is neither a screening fee nor a deposit, or one that was not published in the listing, is an unfair or deceptive trade practice, as is charging fees that are not in the rental agreement.

This is a rental-specific transparency regime, not a general consumer rule read across to housing. The listing must give the base rent and a description of all fees or charges that will be assessed during the residency, itemized and readily identifiable, and the owner is not answerable for an outside website's failure to reproduce what the owner supplied. The 2025 act also wrote charging an applicant a fee in violation of the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act into the state's list of unfair or deceptive trade practices and added a section on prohibited conduct in renting dwelling units. Separately, an owner must give at least 60 days' written notice before raising a fee provided for in a rental agreement.

Penalty for violation

An owner who charges an unauthorized screening fee is liable for $250 and must return all fees the applicant paid; an applicant who sues to enforce the act and prevails is entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs.

The $250 amount attaches specifically to charging an unauthorized screening fee, which covers charging more than fifty dollars, charging a second fee inside the 90-day window, charging any other application-processing fee, and charging without the notice, written agreement or receipt the statute requires. The costs-and-fees provision was widened in 2025 to name an applicant, so someone who never became a tenant can bring the claim. A fee violation is also an unfair or deceptive trade practice under the state’s Unfair Practices Act: charging an applicant a fee that is not a screening fee or deposit, or that was not published in the listing, is named as such at Section 57-12-27. The act’s private remedy allows recovery of actual damages or $100, whichever is greater, rising to as much as three times actual damages or $300, whichever is greater, for a willful practice, plus attorney fees and costs to a prevailing complainant, and the Attorney General may seek a civil penalty of up to $5,000 per willful violation.

Cite this page: "Landlord Atlas, New Mexico Application & Screening Fee Laws (verified August 26, 2026), landlordatlas.com/laws/application-fees/new-mexico/" — free to cite and quote with a link (how these records are verified). Everything above is cited in the citations section below.

Notes and caveats

Common questions: New Mexico application & screening fees

Each answer is the verified value from the table above, restated as a direct answer. Free to quote with a link to this page.

How much can a landlord charge for a rental application fee in New Mexico?
$50 maximum screening fee, and that fee is the only charge an owner may impose to process a rental application.
Does an application fee have to be refunded in New Mexico?
Yes — in New Mexico at least one circumstance requires application-stage money to be returned. The whole screening fee goes back within 30 calendar days if an earlier applicant takes the unit, or if the owner does not obtain a credit report, perform a reference check, use a screening service, or process the application. It must be returned by certified mail, destroyed on request if it was paid by check, or made available for the applicant to collect.
Does a landlord have to give a receipt for an application fee in New Mexico?
Yes — New Mexico requires a receipt for application-stage money.
Does New Mexico have a reusable tenant screening report law?
No statute on reusable screening reports.
Can a landlord charge a holding deposit in New Mexico?
No statute on holding deposits.

Citations

How this record was verified: Direct read of the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act, NMSA 1978 Sections 47-8-1 through 47-8-52, as published by the New Mexico Compilation Commission, with the application-stage sections 47-8-19.1 through 47-8-19.4, the definitions in 47-8-3, the deposit rules in 47-8-18 and the remedies in 47-8-48 read in full; plus a read of the enrolled text of Senate Bill 267 of 2025 (Laws 2025, Chapter 122) on the New Mexico Legislature's site, including its two Unfair Practices Act sections, and a sweep of the 2025 regular, 2025 special and 2026 regular sessions against the legislature's published session-dates document.